Figures read 20 October 2026 Publisher’s card, weigh-in 1
Write to us, and the subjects somebody else has to answer
Letters to a site like this one divide into nine subjects, and only four of them can be settled here. The rest belong to whoever holds the account, to whoever licensed them, or in one case to nobody at all. Sorting them before writing saves a week, so the sorting is the whole of this page and the address is at the foot of it.
1
The four that are settled here
A question about where a figure on a card came from is answerable here and should be asked here, because every figure about the machine on this domain is traceable to a numbered claim on a source sheet and the number can be quoted back. The same goes for a question about the arithmetic: the steps are printed on the card rather than summarised, so an answer can point at the step rather than redoing the sum in private.
A question about what the machine publishes is the third, and it is the easiest of all, because the maker publishes one return for each of its titles and the game’s own data carries the rest. A correction is the fourth. If a figure here is wrong, saying so is the most useful letter anybody sends, and the card gets rewritten rather than quietly adjusted.
Four of the nine subjects can be settled on this domain out of something published, one can be settled by nobody, and the remaining four belong to whoever holds the account
2
The one nobody can settle
Readers write to ask which version of a game a particular venue is running, having read somewhere that the maker ships its titles at several returns and lets whoever runs them pick. That letter cannot be answered, and the reason is a finding rather than an evasion. The studio publishes one figure for each of its thirty-six titles and says nowhere that the figure varies by who is running it. The sources for the other story are secondary and disagree with one another about what the other figures would be.
So nobody on this side of the screen knows, and anybody who tells a reader otherwise is repeating something they did not check. The honest answer to that letter is that the question has no published answer, which is worth rather more than a confident guess.
3
The four that belong to whoever holds the account
A balance, a withdrawal that has not arrived, a document that was rejected and a term as it stands today for one particular account: those four subjects belong to the venue, and not because this publisher would rather not read them. It is that the answer lives in a record nobody here can see. The offers weighed on these cards are advertised by operators holding no Great Britain licence, so the body to go to after the venue is whichever regulator that venue did answer to, named in its own footer.
Two of those four subjects have a clock running on them worth knowing before writing. A venue of that kind commonly states a window for replying to a written complaint, and that window starts when the venue receives the letter rather than when a reader first noticed the problem. Writing here first spends the window without starting it.
Shutting an account for good is the one subject in that group with a better route than either. Registering once with Gamstop Online closes the accounts a reader holds with every operator Britain licenses, and it does so without a conversation.
4
The address, and what a useful letter carries
Write to editor@bigbassbonus.uk. A letter about a figure travels fastest when it names the card it came from and the figure as printed, because the cards carry more than one figure apiece and the wrong one wastes a round. A letter about arithmetic is better still if it says which step looks wrong.
Which parts of an enquiry are kept, and until when, is settled on the page about what is known here. What this publisher may be held to is on the page of terms, and how a figure gets onto a card in the first place is on the page about method.