Figures read 20 October 2026 Publisher’s card, weigh-in 1
How this site is paid, and which side of the deal is published
This domain earns by sending readers out to places that advertise. That is worth saying in the first line rather than the last, because it is the one fact about a site like this one that changes how everything else on it should be read. The useful part is the asymmetry. What a credit of £50.00 leaves a reader can be worked out to the penny from figures anybody can open, and comes to £8.88. What the same referral pays this publisher is not published by anybody, this publisher included, and the rest of this card is about living with that.
What the machine states 96.71 per cent Big Bass Bonanza’s own figure, taken off the game sheet. It is set out in two places that agree with each other, and no arrangement anybody here enters into moves it by a hundredth. What the offer states £50.00 at 25 times A credit of the shape commonly advertised, with staking of twenty-five times the credit asked before a withdrawal. Read off what offers of that shape state, in the units they state them in. What the two make when multiplied £8.88 What survives the staking at a stake of 10p a turn, which this publisher assumes and names wherever it spends it. A reader can check the figure. Nobody outside two companies can check what the referral earns.
1
What the arrangement is, in kind
A button on a card leads out through an address of this publisher’s own before it reaches anybody else, so an arrival can be attributed and paid for. Arrangements of that sort come in two classes. One pays a fixed sum for an arrival that goes on to open an account. The other pays a share of what that account turns out to be worth to whoever runs it, month after month, for as long as the account lives.
Nothing on this domain is paid for by being written about, and no position in any listing here is for sale. What the specific terms of any arrangement are is commercial between two parties and is not published, by this publisher or by the other side, and a reader should assume the same of every site of this kind whether it says so or not.
2
Where that points, and where it does not
Take the second class of arrangement at face value and the direction of the incentive is plain. A publisher paid a share of what an account proves worth is paid more when the account proves worth more to the other side, which is to say when the reader does worse. Nobody should have to infer that from the small print, so it is written here in full.
What that incentive cannot reach is the arithmetic. The figures the sums run on are published by somebody else and the steps are printed on the card, so bending a result means either misquoting a source that anybody can open or making an error that anybody can find. Both are visible. The space for a thumb on the scale is in the figures a site chooses not to show, and this is the reverse of that: the workings are the page.
| The title weighed | Published return | Break-even play-through | The offer asks | What £50.00 is worth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The higher-returning title | 96.71 per cent | 30.4 times | 25 times | £8.88 |
| The lower-returning title | 96.07 per cent | 25.4 times | 25 times | £0.88 |
| What the title is worth | 0.64 points of return | 5.0 times | no change | £8.00 |
£8.00 of a £50.00 credit turns on nothing but which title of the family it is spent on, a choice no cashier makes and no advertisement mentions
3
The only defence worth offering
Sites of this kind usually answer the question with an assurance: the rankings are independent, the reviews are impartial, the team is honest. An assurance is worth nothing, because the dishonest version says the same words. The answer that is worth something is a method a stranger can audit, and the figures above are an instance of it. Two titles of one family, two published returns, one set of terms, and £8.00 of difference that nobody advertises.
There is no scoring system here, no marks out of anything and no claim that anybody tried an offer, because none of those can be checked and all of them would have to be taken on trust. How a figure is weighed here sets out the method on one figure from end to end. Who weighs this puts a number on how much of the domain stands on somebody else’s published word. Terms of use draws out what follows from that number being 96 of 120 and not 120 of 120.